失踪2009

恐怖片韩国2009

主演:文成根,秋瓷炫,全世贤,吴成秀,南文哲,黃恩貞,孫健宇,李鳳奎,孙荣顺,权五镇,李恩熙,許起虎

导演:金成洪

 剧照

失踪2009 剧照 NO.1失踪2009 剧照 NO.2失踪2009 剧照 NO.3失踪2009 剧照 NO.4失踪2009 剧照 NO.5失踪2009 剧照 NO.6失踪2009 剧照 NO.13失踪2009 剧照 NO.14失踪2009 剧照 NO.15失踪2009 剧照 NO.16失踪2009 剧照 NO.17失踪2009 剧照 NO.18失踪2009 剧照 NO.19失踪2009 剧照 NO.20
更新时间:2024-05-31 08:10

详细剧情

  长像出众的妹妹(金世红 饰)和朋友出游住进一家小旅馆,却未曾想到遭遇变态店主潘根(文成根 饰)。这个外表忠厚老实的店主残忍的杀死妹妹的朋友并囚禁妹妹,对她百般折磨凌辱。几天以后,另一位同样长样出众的少女贤婷(秋瓷炫 饰)来到这个小镇寻访自己的妹妹。经过多番打探之后,她怀疑是旅馆店主绑架自己的妹妹,在警察的帮助下,他们对潘根的地下室进行了搜查,可是最终一无所获。正当姐姐贤婷打算离开小镇的时候,旅馆店主潘根意外出现,并诱骗她来到自己的住处。此时妹妹其实早已被旅馆店主杀害,而姐姐陷入了一个和妹妹当初同样危险的境遇……  本片根据真实绑架案件改编。

 长篇影评

 1 ) 两男一女极简布景——《爱丽丝的失踪》

两男一女极简布景——《爱丽丝的失踪》

今天聊聊电影《爱丽丝的失踪》。

片名The Disappearance of Alice Creed (2009),别名爱丽丝蒸发奇案(港) / 爱丽丝失踪事件簿(台)。

本片是导演J·布莱克森自编自导的处女作长片,影片用极少的演员和极简的布景,完成了一个极为有趣反转颇多的惊悚小故事。

但凡能够闯出一番名号的处女作,作品都是带有鲜明的个人特点和为人称道的优点。本片最大的特点与昆塔《落水狗》类似,没有复杂的布景,仅依靠台词和表演推动剧情,最终呈现一个完成度极高的有趣故事。

就像演职员表所示,《爱丽丝的失踪》全部演员总共就三人。

两男一女共处一室,两名男人是绑匪,女人是被绑架的倒霉蛋。

绑匪里年纪大的叫维克特,面相凶恶,行事干练,一举一动透露出惯犯的自信和沉稳。年纪轻点的叫丹尼尔,看起来唯唯诺诺,唯维克特马首是瞻,复杂打下手,类似从犯角色。

剩下那位女性就是片名提到的爱丽丝。她是一名富家女,老爸很有钱,但她和老爸感情却不见得多好,显得很叛逆。

《爱丽丝的失踪》的主要场景也十分简单,就一座密不透风的房子,绝大部分时间两男一女都在这间房子里度过,顶多加上一辆汽车和废仓库。

简单布景同时,影片还照顾了重口味恶趣味。变装、囚禁、捆绑、受辱、野外……似乎这些极为吸睛的标签都可以用在这部影片上。而且观众们看完正片后也不会觉得有一丝一毫的标题党,这些元素都在影片中有详细表现。

最为亮眼的就是影片剧情。剧情也像布景一样,猛地一看十分简单。绑匪精心策划绑架了爱丽丝,向爱丽丝老爹索要两百万现金。

从影片第一秒开始,凌厉的剪辑就瞬间抓住观众,经验丰富行事干练的绑匪预示着他们将要做一起大案。于是从影片一开始,悬念就设立完成。

而紧随其后的剧情更是反转不断,每每以为事情可以一帆风顺地走下去时,就会来一点儿揪心的小状况。小悬念也没有停过,大到整个绑架案、小到一个弹壳,都能玩出新花样。

好的剧本是成功的一半。《爱丽丝的失踪》优秀的剧本是影片成功的基础,影片进行中持续不断地推出新悬念,慢慢积蓄观众情绪,直到最后高潮彻底宣泄,整体感受酣畅淋漓。

最后回到片名《爱丽丝的失踪》,三个人一顿充满悬念的操作后,最终,爱丽丝还是失踪了……

对于这种强调反转的电影,观众们只需要按照片名去找来看就行。千万不要看那些剧透式详解,所谓详解就是毫无营养地将整个故事复述一遍,观众将毫无观影乐趣可言。

所有的小悬念、小反转,观众一定要沉浸式体验电影时才能有所体会。

两男一女极简布景,

悬念不断反转不停。

这里是硬核影迷集散地,欢迎关注:妙看影视

 2 ) 事实证明:耽美还是美型的好

       这部低成本的片子是我在豆瓣上淘来的,下载完后就扔在文件夹中冷藏着,今天好不容易打起兴致来看,发现是一部还不错的片子。我的朋友在我的片库里找片时,是直接把这部忽略过去的,确实,这不是一部适合看惯好莱坞大片的观众的片子,它更偏于那种小众,节奏有些缓慢,场景也不够壮观,但是它适合慢慢地看,从中体会着小人物的跌宕起伏,也别有一番滋味。
        可是。。。对于结尾那个大反转,当满脸络腮胡子的大叔和一脸受样的小青年两人眼含热泪深情对望时,我,瞬间菊紧了。。。我完全感受不到其中的深情和纠结,我只能感觉到恶寒。部。。(大叔:丹尼,你爱我,我知道你爱我,我感觉得到,你抱我的时候,你亲我的时候。。。)各位,我已经无力吐槽,因为我的狗血已经全喷涌而出,奉献在了这个伟大的时刻。谁能告诉我前一刻还像仇人一样你给我一拳、我给你一枪的两人,怎么瞬间变成了“神交已久”的恋人?是我三观不够奇葩还是世界变化太快?也许片中早有揭示,当小受跪着哭喊“我害怕极了,你保护了我,我永远也不会忘记”时,我纯洁地认为只是普通的兄弟情,况且下个瞬间就是小受将大叔扑倒在地。
       这部片子教育了我们:1.同性恋心软是没有好下场的 2.双性恋两边都顾是没有好下场的 3.直女要远离同性恋和双性恋的组合

 3 ) 三个人的电影

一部从头到尾只有三个演员的电影,基本上就靠对白来揭示剧情。当然比起日本爱情动作片还是差一点的,要知道人家往往就两个演员从头演到尾,对白也就那么简单的几句,可是就连不懂日语的人都看得懂……

很早的时候看过一部香港片,更牛,全片就一个女的,从头演到尾,靠电话来推动剧情。可惜忘了叫什么名字了。

 4 ) one question

在绑架Alice的破屋子里,Danny去开车时,Vic从Alice口中知道了Danny骗了他,问Alice为什么还继续演戏,然后不等回答,自言自语地说,“因为他答应把钱分给你一份。”
我的问题是,Alice本来就是富家女,并且是独生女,Vic又不认识她,怎知道她爸爸不给她钱?怎知道Alice也想分钱?

 5 ) [Film Review] The Disappearance of Alice Creed (2009) & I Care a Lot (2020)

The first and third features from English filmmaker J Blakeson, who most certainly has a partiality for dark and queer characters. TDoAC is a three-person hostage thriller shot on a shoestring, in the mode of William Wyler’s THE COLLECTOR (1965), only more ascetic and messier.

The titular Alice Creed (Arterton) is a rich daddy’s girl, who is kidnapped by two ex-convicts Danny (Compston) and Vic (Marsan), things would go peachy for everyone had it not been the fact that Danny is Alice’s ex-boyfriend, and once this cardinal information is divulged, the whole shebang veers to murkier waters as viewers cannot ascertain who among the three would be the victor, each one seems to an unknown quantity.

The craft on show is adroit, the opening wordless sequences are neat and bracing shot and edited, they smooth the way for audience to gear up for what it is coming - a typical hostage situation set in a single, drab location, where a voluptuous Arterton has to undergo some roughhousing, being gagged, tied, undressed (the usual suspects of S&M fantasy), redressed, and later choked and slapped, but most humiliating of it all, urinating to a bedpan in front of two masked kidnappers.

Well, Blakeson does not actually go to extremes on the path to a torture porn, instead he manipulates various plot twists in a canny way that each time, when a character achieves some sort leverage, the table will be turned in a trice. Also, the fluidity of sexuality plays a major part in the double-cross/counter-double-cross gamesmanship, can sweet nothings soften the gun barrel pointing at your face? Twice out of three you might not luck out.

The long and short of it, TDoAC is an absorbing debut feature mines brilliantly into its meager resource and the outstanding performances from its three players. Can a cowing Eddie Marsan transform himself into a meek lover? You must see for yourself; whereas Martin Compston portrays Danny’s bisexual oscillation with adequacy and Arterton goes for broke in her birthday suit, when all is said and done, countering to what its title alludes to, “disappearance” could be a blessing in disguise.

However, in I CARE A LOT, a Rosamund Pike’s feminist vehicle, Blakeson’s irony and sarcasm goes pitch black. Pike plays a ruthless con woman Marla Grayson, who operates a company legally acquiring the guardianship of elderly people through a duplicitous scheme (often assisted by unscrupulous doctors and inane judges), so their assets are completely at her disposal (though on the face of it, the juridical procedures feel rather facile).

Her gravy train hits a snag when she milks a wrong cow, Jennifer Peterson (a nonplussed then fuming Wiest is always a corker), the apparently perfect candidate, affluent, childless, all alone in the world, actually has a formable friend at court, the Russian mafia boss Roman Lunyov (Dinklage). So when the gloves are off, it is Marla and her girlfriend Fran (González) versus the murderous gangsters, do they have a chance? Or, shall we care?

The answer is yes and no, the ineptitude of Roman’s riffraff is astonishingly shocking (what can you say? they botch not one but two cases of snuffing a defenseless, unconscious woman!), and Marla is depicted as an amoral overachiever, a stony-faced ballbuster, a totally unregenerate bitch (not a scintilla of remorse can be traced on her face), ergo, that really puts audience off from empathizing with her, save for the pungent disgust towards the American Dream she is spoiling for.

If its paint-by-number predator/prey dichotomy sounds trite, its David and Goliath tale seems incredulous and oversimplified, what saves I CARE A LOT from heading to the abyss is Pike. Tricked out in fetching attire and unflappable towards any threats shot at her from the other sex, her Marla is “Amazing Amy” with a vengeance and irrefragably batting for the other team (her affection for Fran is genuine, a viewer might second-guess Marla’s unspecified backstory, how her reprehensible carapace could be the outgrowth of the malefic influence inflicted by the world at large, and Fran’s female warmth becomes her only safe haven). Even in the absence of cordial redeeming feats, it is still riveting to watch Pike’s Marla in action, her fearlessness is both scary and inspiring, you hate her guts but also crave for her guts (or maybe just a part of) ambivalence is here to stay.

At last, Blakeson plumps for poetic justice to put paid to Marla’s unstoppable ascension (can it be construed as a veiled pro-gun testimony? In the United States, the only way for a poor, miserable guy to seek justice from a powerful woman is to use anti-personnel weaponry, how reassuring!), but it feels bathetic, unlike Martin Scorsese’s THE WOLF OF WALL STREET (2013), Blakeson doesn’t know how to dream up a proper coda for a repulsive character, he settles for the safest exit strategy, since everything in I CARE A LOT is Manichaean.

Elsewhere, a debonair Messina lights up the screen as an unethical, soigné lawyer who tries and fails to railroad Marla into dancing to his tunes; Dinklage is always an atypical screen magnet, here his surly temperament is a good match with Pike’s posh sharpness. From TDoAC to I CARE A LOT, the production design goes from drab to hip, Marc Canham’s hypnotic electronic buzz swells and intensifies, but Blakeson’s script and imagination seems to be impeded by a bigger scale and more handsome budget, is it the downside of the money monster?

referential entries: William Wyler’s THE COLLECTOR (1965, 8.0/10); Martin Scorsese’s THE WOLF OF WALL STREET (2013, 8.0/10).

Title: The Disappearance of Alice Creed
Year: 2009
Country: UK
Language: English
Genre: Crime, Thriller
Director/Screenwriter: J Blakeson
Music: Marc Canham
Cinematography: Philipp Blaubach
Editing: Mark Eckersley
Cast:
Gemma Arterton
Martin Compston
Eddie Marsan
Rating: 6.9/10
Title: I Care a Lot
Year: 2020
Country: USA, UK
Language: English
Genre: Comedy, Crime, Thriller
Director/Screenwriter: J Blakeson
Music: Marc Canham
Cinematography: Doug Emmett
Editing: Mark Eckersley
Cast:
Rosamund Pike
Peter Dinklage
Eiza González
Dianne Wiest
Chris Messina
Isiah Whitlock Jr.
Damian Young
Nicholas Logan
Alicia Witt
Macon Blair
Celeste Oliva
Rating: 6.4/10

 6 ) 生命诚可贵,爱情价更高,若为金钱故,二者皆可抛

编剧是个妙人。

 

开头是一个很普通的犯罪电影,从准备到实施,剪辑明快,一气呵成,没有一句废话。

 

后面层层抽丝拨茧,人物性格背景随着情节发展逐渐展现,而性格的暴露也进一步推动了情节的发展。虽然只有3个人,可是一点儿也不沉闷。

 

Jonny 是个穷小子,为了和富家女恋爱不惜铤而走险去绑架。但是在计划过程中,他和另一个绑匪之间的关系也产生了变化。而被绑架的人,爱丽丝也不是省油的灯。三个人,在两天之中较量智商和情商,结局随时都可以改变。这让我想起07年裘德洛和迈克尔凯恩德《足迹》,那部戏只有两个人,却也一直让人揪心到最后一刻。

 

这就是英国文学的博大精深之处。他们能用极优美的语言,描述平淡无奇的生活,他们也能在极小的格局里把人性之复杂表达的淋漓尽致。他们的电影里很少有好莱坞流水线出来的典型人物,可是每个人物又都个性鲜明,从很多意义上讲也是典型,只不过更细腻更丰富。

 

从表演上来讲,本片的三位和《足迹》那两位还是差距不小,但是也没有什么大纰漏。Jonny是3个人关系的核心,可是他可能是三位里最弱的,所以影片的高潮部分并不突出。美女真是好看,欧洲演员的献身精神非美国可比。

 短评

同性恋异性恋双性恋能同时共处一室的概率,估计要小于彗星撞地球。

7分钟前
  • 推荐

唯一少的一颗星,就是给没看到男男做爱的场面。我想在这种刀锋浪尖里的做爱,才是最刺激最感人最销魂的吧~

11分钟前
  • 顾凉城
  • 推荐

总共就三人出场 却将人物之间互相猜疑背叛欺骗的关系刻画得极度精细 包括监禁 捆绑 排泄 施暴 虐待 同性恋 枪杀等等要素 绑架只是个幌子 精彩部分在裸体的丹尼举枪用脚摁住旧情人的脖颈 以及最后的搏命戏码等等 唯一遗憾是维克托最后给出的钥匙 强行将结局引正了 期待导演剪辑腐二尸结局

16分钟前
  • 文泽尔
  • 推荐

3个演员 几个场景 最大的成本是烧了个车

20分钟前
  • ti
  • 推荐

这是一出舞台剧 有同有异有双

25分钟前
  • 披着人皮的鬼
  • 推荐

一般般

30分钟前
  • 胡子
  • 还行

三个人物,两个主要场景,像这种小成本本就应该给些鼓励、在这种极简的条件背后需要的是剧作足够的张力,观众才不会腻烦,本片基本做到了每二十分钟一个转折,后半段则更密集。虽然感情戏有点离谱,不过也能接受,虽然只有三个演员,但杰玛与马丁这都不是无名小演员,演得也好。胡子男也不错。

34分钟前
  • 桃桃林林
  • 还行

用有限的空间营造出强烈的压抑感,前面不错后面松散了些,而且漏洞太多了,我要是能抢到枪还还去找什么钥匙啊直接崩开锁头就得了,而且打了电话也没警察来救人这真是……女主角的演技真是不错~~~双性恋男猪的脸很有说服力。看完片子上来标注才发现是英国出品,哈哈真不愧是大不列颠腐国人民

37分钟前
  • 游牧人·芳汀
  • 还行

我的天,我很怀疑给4星的你们是不是看到果体就兴奋 忘了里面那些2B的桥段??有手枪 一枪把锁头打掉就行了还傻呵呵的跑回去找钥匙2个绑匪相爱了 也就算了 之前还故意铺垫2个人关系不是很好 好嘛 后来又要上这个女的 然后 这个女的 又傻逼的很!!!!!不知所谓!

39分钟前
  • 较差

这俩都sb吧,犯罪的时候最好别把爱的人带上。

41分钟前
  • 高压电
  • 还行

让我吃了一大惊~

42分钟前
  • Dominic
  • 较差

很有反转和惊悚感觉的电影,节奏很好,情感表露到位,更有去年人气颇旺的杰玛·阿特登 很职业的宽衣解带,要鼓励。

46分钟前
  • 思考的猫
  • 推荐

我們異性戀和我們同性戀是生活在同一個世界的。

51分钟前
  • 假面Vic小飛俠
  • 还行

玉不琢不成器,好的题材需要大量的雕琢来呈现,这个片子缺点就在太硬了,细节上做的不够,不是说镜头运动上的细节,是人物内向的心理变化与演进。尤其是最后女主角在车里哭的那个镜头,太短,不够饱满,该释放的情绪没出来,就落了下风。作为处女作,在商业和艺术的平衡性上做的很不错。

52分钟前
  • 死咗
  • 还行

特像舞台剧

57分钟前
  • 闲人
  • 还行

精彩,一张一弛,把握得很好啊

58分钟前
  • #烧光光#
  • 力荐

前面有条不紊,后面乱了章法

1小时前
  • 达到厂
  • 还行

低成本類型電影典范,awesome

1小时前
  • 五色全味
  • 推荐

持续不断地疑惑和震惊......

1小时前
  • September
  • 推荐

扭得夸张了点,不过还是蛮有意思。大叔不走运,小弟很绝情,爱丽丝到最后是真的失踪了。

1小时前
  • matchbox
  • 推荐

返回首页返回顶部

Copyright © 2023 All Rights Reserved